Parametric, Polar, and Vector Functions - AP Calculus BC
Card 0 of 390
Rewrite as a Cartesian equation:
![x = $t^{2}$ + 2t + 1, y = $t^{2}$ - 2t + 1, t \in [-1, 1]](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/180244/gif.latex)
Rewrite as a Cartesian equation:
Tap to see back →



So
or 
We are restricting
to values on
, so
is nonnegative; we choose
.
Also,



So
or 
We are restricting
to values on
, so
is nonpositive; we choose

or equivalently,

to make
nonpositive.
Then,

and





So
or
We are restricting to values on
, so
is nonnegative; we choose
.
Also,
So
or
We are restricting to values on
, so
is nonpositive; we choose
or equivalently,
to make nonpositive.
Then,
and
Rewrite as a Cartesian equation:

Rewrite as a Cartesian equation:
Tap to see back →

, so

This makes the Cartesian equation
.
, so
This makes the Cartesian equation
.
Draw the graph of
from
.
Draw the graph of from
.
Tap to see back →
Between
and
, the radius approaches
from
.
From
to
the radius goes from
to
.
Between
and
, the curve is redrawn in the opposite quadrant, the first quadrant as the radius approaches
.
From
and
, the curve is redrawn in the second quadrant as the radius approaches
from
.
Between and
, the radius approaches
from
.
From to
the radius goes from
to
.
Between and
, the curve is redrawn in the opposite quadrant, the first quadrant as the radius approaches
.
From and
, the curve is redrawn in the second quadrant as the radius approaches
from
.
Draw the graph of
where
.
Draw the graph of where
.
Tap to see back →
Because this function has a period of
, the amplitude of the graph
appear at a reference angle of
(angles halfway between the angles of the axes).
Between
and
the radius approaches 1 from 0.
Between
and
, the radius approaches 0 from 1.
From
to
the radius approaches -1 from 0 and is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the fourth quadrant because it has a negative radius.
Between
and
, the radius approaches 0 from -1, and is also drawn in the fourth quadrant.
From
and
, the radius approaches 1 from 0. Between
and
, the radius approaches 0 from 1.
Then between
and
the radius approaches -1 from 0. Because it is a negative radius, it is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the second quadrant. Likewise, as the radius approaches 0 from -1. Between
and
, the curve is drawn in the second quadrant.
Because this function has a period of , the amplitude of the graph
appear at a reference angle of
(angles halfway between the angles of the axes).
Between and
the radius approaches 1 from 0.
Between and
, the radius approaches 0 from 1.
From to
the radius approaches -1 from 0 and is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the fourth quadrant because it has a negative radius.
Between and
, the radius approaches 0 from -1, and is also drawn in the fourth quadrant.
From and
, the radius approaches 1 from 0. Between
and
, the radius approaches 0 from 1.
Then between and
the radius approaches -1 from 0. Because it is a negative radius, it is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the second quadrant. Likewise, as the radius approaches 0 from -1. Between
and
, the curve is drawn in the second quadrant.
Graph
where
.
Graph where
.
Tap to see back →
Taking the graph of
, we only want the areas in the positive first quadrant because the radius is squared and cannot be negative.
This leaves us with the areas from
to
,
to
, and
to
.
Then, when we take the square root of the radius, we get both a positive and negative answer with a maximum and minimum radius of
.
To draw the graph, the radius is 1 at
and traces to 0 at
. As well, the negative part of the radius starts at -1 and traces to zero in the opposite quadrant, the third quadrant.
From
to
, the curves are traced from 0 to 1 and 0 to -1 in the fourth quadrant. Following this pattern, the graph is redrawn again from the areas included in
to
.
Taking the graph of , we only want the areas in the positive first quadrant because the radius is squared and cannot be negative.
This leaves us with the areas from to
,
to
, and
to
.
Then, when we take the square root of the radius, we get both a positive and negative answer with a maximum and minimum radius of .
To draw the graph, the radius is 1 at and traces to 0 at
. As well, the negative part of the radius starts at -1 and traces to zero in the opposite quadrant, the third quadrant.
From to
, the curves are traced from 0 to 1 and 0 to -1 in the fourth quadrant. Following this pattern, the graph is redrawn again from the areas included in
to
.
Draw the curve of
from
.
Draw the curve of from
.
Tap to see back →
Taking the graph of
, we only want the areas in the positive first quadrant because the radius is squared and cannot be negative.
This leaves us with the areas from
to
and
to
.
Then, when we take the square root of the radius, we get both a positive and negative answer with a maximum and minimum radius of
.
To draw the graph, the radius is 0 at
and traces to 1 at
. As well, the negative part of the radius starts at 0 and traces to-1 in the opposite quadrant, the third quadrant.
From
to
, the curves are traced from 1 to 0 and -1 to 0 in the third quadrant.
Following this pattern, the graph is redrawn again from the areas included in
to
.
Taking the graph of , we only want the areas in the positive first quadrant because the radius is squared and cannot be negative.
This leaves us with the areas from to
and
to
.
Then, when we take the square root of the radius, we get both a positive and negative answer with a maximum and minimum radius of .
To draw the graph, the radius is 0 at and traces to 1 at
. As well, the negative part of the radius starts at 0 and traces to-1 in the opposite quadrant, the third quadrant.
From to
, the curves are traced from 1 to 0 and -1 to 0 in the third quadrant.
Following this pattern, the graph is redrawn again from the areas included in to
.
If
and
, what is
in terms of
(rectangular form)?
If and
, what is
in terms of
(rectangular form)?
Tap to see back →
Given
and
, we can find
in terms of
by isolating
in both equations:


Since both of these transformations equal
, we can set them equal to each other:




Given and
, we can find
in terms of
by isolating
in both equations:
Since both of these transformations equal , we can set them equal to each other:
Find the length of the following parametric curve
,
,
.
Find the length of the following parametric curve
,
,
.
Tap to see back →
The length of a curve is found using the equation 
We use the product rule,
, when
and
are functions of
,
the trigonometric rule,
and ![$\frac{d}{dt}$[sin(t)]=cos(t)](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/429206/gif.latex)
and exponential rule,
to find
and
.
In this case
, 





The length of this curve is

Using the identity 



Using the identity 

Using the trigonometric identity
where
is a constant and 

Using the exponential rule, 

Using the exponential rule,
, gives us the final solution

The length of a curve is found using the equation
We use the product rule,
, when
and
are functions of
,
the trigonometric rule,
and
and exponential rule,
to find
and
.
In this case
,
The length of this curve is
Using the identity
Using the identity
Using the trigonometric identity where
is a constant and
Using the exponential rule,
Using the exponential rule, , gives us the final solution
Given
and
, what is the arc length between
?
Given and
, what is the arc length between
?
Tap to see back →
In order to find the arc length, we must use the arc length formula for parametric curves:
.
Given
and
, we can use using the Power Rule
 for all
, to derive
and
.
Plugging these values and our boundary values for
into the arc length equation, we get:



Now, using the Power Rule for Integrals
for all
,
we can determine that:
![L=[t$\sqrt{5}$]_${0}^{4}$\textrm{}dt](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/417526/gif.latex)


In order to find the arc length, we must use the arc length formula for parametric curves:
.
Given and
, we can use using the Power Rule
 for all , to derive
and
.
Plugging these values and our boundary values for into the arc length equation, we get:
Now, using the Power Rule for Integrals
for all
,
we can determine that:
Given
and
, what is the length of the arc from
?
Given and
, what is the length of the arc from
?
Tap to see back →
In order to find the arc length, we must use the arc length formula for parametric curves:
.
Given
and
, we can use using the Power Rule
 for all
, to derive
and
.
Plugging these values and our boundary values for
into the arc length equation, we get:





Now, using the Power Rule for Integrals
for all
,
we can determine that:
![L=[2t$\sqrt{13}$]_${0}^{2}$\textrm{}](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/420925/gif.latex)


In order to find the arc length, we must use the arc length formula for parametric curves:
.
Given and
, we can use using the Power Rule
 for all , to derive
and
.
Plugging these values and our boundary values for into the arc length equation, we get:
Now, using the Power Rule for Integrals
for all
,
we can determine that:
Find dy/dx at the point corresponding to the given value of the parameter without eliminating the parameter:

Find dy/dx at the point corresponding to the given value of the parameter without eliminating the parameter:
Tap to see back →
The formula for dy/dx for parametric equations is given as:

From the problem statement:

If we plug these into the above equation we end up with:


If we plug in our given value for t, we end up with:

This is one of the answer choices.
The formula for dy/dx for parametric equations is given as:
From the problem statement:
If we plug these into the above equation we end up with:
If we plug in our given value for t, we end up with:
This is one of the answer choices.
Rewrite in polar form:

Rewrite in polar form:
Tap to see back →
Graph the equation
where
.
Graph the equation where
.
Tap to see back →
At angle
the graph as a radius of
. As it approaches
, the radius approaches
.
As the graph approaches
, the radius approaches
.
Because this is a negative radius, the curve is drawn in the opposite quadrant between
and
.
Between
and
, the radius approaches
from
and redraws the curve in the first quadrant.
Between
and
, the graph redraws the curve in the fourth quadrant as the radius approaches
from
.
At angle the graph as a radius of
. As it approaches
, the radius approaches
.
As the graph approaches , the radius approaches
.
Because this is a negative radius, the curve is drawn in the opposite quadrant between and
.
Between and
, the radius approaches
from
and redraws the curve in the first quadrant.
Between and
, the graph redraws the curve in the fourth quadrant as the radius approaches
from
.
Draw the graph of
from
.
Draw the graph of from
.
Tap to see back →
Because this function has a period of
, the x-intercepts of the graph
happen at a reference angle of
(angles halfway between the angles of the axes).
Between
and
the radius approaches
from
.
Between
and
, the radius approaches
from
and is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the third quadrant because it has a negative radius.
From
to
the radius approaches
from
, and is drawn in the fourth quadrant, the opposite quadrant.
Between
and
, the radius approaches
from
.
From
and
, the radius approaches
from
.
Between
and
, the radius approaches
from
. Because it is a negative radius, it is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the first quadrant.
Then between
and
the radius approaches
from
and is draw in the second quadrant.
Finally between
and
, the radius approaches
from
.
Because this function has a period of , the x-intercepts of the graph
happen at a reference angle of
(angles halfway between the angles of the axes).
Between and
the radius approaches
from
.
Between and
, the radius approaches
from
and is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the third quadrant because it has a negative radius.
From to
the radius approaches
from
, and is drawn in the fourth quadrant, the opposite quadrant.
Between and
, the radius approaches
from
.
From and
, the radius approaches
from
.
Between and
, the radius approaches
from
. Because it is a negative radius, it is drawn in the opposite quadrant, the first quadrant.
Then between and
the radius approaches
from
and is draw in the second quadrant.
Finally between and
, the radius approaches
from
.
What is the following coordinate in polar form?

Provide the angle in degrees.
What is the following coordinate in polar form?
Provide the angle in degrees.
Tap to see back →
To calculate the polar coordinate, use



However, keep track of the angle here. 68 degree is the mathematical equivalent of the expression, but we know the point (-2,-5) is in the 3rd quadrant, so we have to add 180 to it to get 248.
Some calculators might already have provided you with the correct answer.
.
To calculate the polar coordinate, use
However, keep track of the angle here. 68 degree is the mathematical equivalent of the expression, but we know the point (-2,-5) is in the 3rd quadrant, so we have to add 180 to it to get 248.
Some calculators might already have provided you with the correct answer.
.
What is the equation
in polar form?
What is the equation in polar form?
Tap to see back →
We can convert from rectangular form to polar form by using the following identities:
and
. Given
, then
.
. Dividing both sides by
,




We can convert from rectangular form to polar form by using the following identities: and
. Given
, then
.
. Dividing both sides by
,
What is the equation
in polar form?
What is the equation in polar form?
Tap to see back →
We can convert from rectangular form to polar form by using the following identities:
and
. Given
, then
. Multiplying both sides by
,



We can convert from rectangular form to polar form by using the following identities: and
. Given
, then
. Multiplying both sides by
,
Convert the following function into polar form:

Convert the following function into polar form:
Tap to see back →
The following formulas were used to convert the function from polar to Cartestian coordinates:

Note that the last formula is a manipulation of a trignometric identity.
Simply replace these with x and y in the original function.



The following formulas were used to convert the function from polar to Cartestian coordinates:
Note that the last formula is a manipulation of a trignometric identity.
Simply replace these with x and y in the original function.
What is the equation
in polar form?
What is the equation in polar form?
Tap to see back →
We can convert from rectangular to polar form by using the following trigonometric identities:
and
. Given
, then:


Dividing both sides by
, we get:




We can convert from rectangular to polar form by using the following trigonometric identities: and
. Given
, then:
Dividing both sides by , we get:
What is the polar form of
?
What is the polar form of ?
Tap to see back →
We can convert from rectangular to polar form by using the following trigonometric identities:
and
. Given
, then:


Dividing both sides by
, we get:




We can convert from rectangular to polar form by using the following trigonometric identities: and
. Given
, then:
Dividing both sides by , we get: