Award-Winning College Physics Tutors
serving St. Louis, MO

College-level physics demands comfort with calculus-based reasoning — deriving equations of motion, integrating force over a path for work, or applying differential equations to oscillations. Kathleen's math degree from Washington University and her experience teaching through multivariable calculus mean she can unpack both the physics intuition and the mathematical machinery simultaneously.

Teaching AP Chemistry, Honors Biology, and Anatomy & Physiology in a high school classroom means Samuel regularly translates physics into the language his students already speak — explaining pressure gradients through circulatory systems, connecting thermodynamic laws to calorimetry labs, and grounding wave behavior in real instrumentation. His master's in science education sharpens that skill further, giving him a structured way to diagnose exactly where a student's conceptual understanding breaks down during multi-step problem solving. Rated 4.9 by students.

I am interested in Physics and Mathematics and working out practical problems from plumbing to electronics. I will someday go back for my Ph.D. in Physics but until then I am looking to grow as an engineer or computer programmer.

Having spent four years solving problems in thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum mechanics as part of his chemistry degree at Missouri State, Jacob approaches college physics with the mathematical rigor it demands. He's especially strong on topics where physics and chemistry overlap — electromagnetism, fluid dynamics, and energy conservation — and breaks multi-step problems into clear, logical sequences.

I am excited to help anyone who might need it!

Five years of tutoring undergraduate physics while completing a PhD in the subject means Mayuri has seen every way students get tripped up — from misapplying Newton's third law in multi-body problems to losing signs in electric potential calculations. She teaches the diagnostic step most students rush past: figuring out which physical principle actually governs a scenario before touching any math. Her triple background in physics, mathematics, and statistics makes her especially comfortable with the calculus-heavy and data-driven portions of the course.

College physics ramps up fast — suddenly rotational dynamics, electromagnetic induction, and wave optics all demand calculus fluency on top of conceptual understanding. Anatoliy's math background through calculus BC combined with his science training means he can tackle both sides of that challenge simultaneously. He's especially effective at connecting the integral and differential forms of physics equations to their physical meaning.

Certified to teach secondary science and holding a 33 ACT, Megan brings a teacher's instinct for diagnosing exactly where a student's reasoning breaks down — whether it's setting up free-body diagrams, misapplying conservation laws, or losing the physics inside the calculus. Her graduate work in curriculum design means she structures problem-solving practice deliberately, building from conceptual understanding to multi-step quantitative problems rather than just assigning more homework. Rated 5.0 by students.

Chemical engineering coursework is essentially college physics with higher stakes — fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and thermodynamics applied to industrial-scale systems where getting the math wrong has real consequences. Austin brings that engineering rigor to problems involving energy balances, pressure, and mechanics, walking students through the physical reasoning step by step rather than letting them default to equation hunting.

Free-body diagrams, torque calculations, stress analysis, fluid dynamics — Jordan didn't just study these in a textbook but worked through them as core requirements of a mechanical engineering degree, where getting the physics wrong means the design fails. That engineering lens means he tackles college physics problems the way a practicing engineer would: sketching the system, identifying constraints, and choosing the right principle before touching an equation. He's especially sharp on mechanics and thermodynamics, the two areas where his coursework went deepest.

Biomedical engineering at VCU meant Waleed spent years applying physics to biological systems — modeling forces on prosthetic joints, analyzing fluid flow through vessels, understanding the electromagnetic principles behind imaging equipment like MRI and ultrasound. That gives him a concrete hook for the mechanics, thermodynamics, and E&M topics that fill college physics problem sets, since he can ground abstract equations in systems students can actually picture. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Working at an ExxonMobil refinery before MIT Sloan meant Caroline spent years applying thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and force analysis to real industrial systems — the same physics that fills college problem sets, except with actual consequences for getting the math wrong. Her mechanical engineering M.S. from WashU (magna cum laude) gave her deep fluency with calculus-based derivations, so she can walk through everything from torque problems to heat transfer without skipping the steps that textbooks gloss over. Rated 5.0 by students.

Premed coursework and a computing degree at Notre Dame meant Aidan sat through the full sequence of calculus-based physics — mechanics, E&M, waves — while simultaneously learning to think algorithmically about complex problems. That combination is particularly useful when students hit the wall where physics stops being plug-and-chug and starts requiring multi-step reasoning, like connecting free-body diagrams to energy methods or translating a word problem into the right integral. His 35 ACT speaks to the quantitative fluency he brings to those tougher setups.

Thermodynamics is where Rahul lights up — it was his favorite corner of Cornell's chemical engineering program, and that enthusiasm shows when he's walking someone through heat engines, entropy, or the first and second laws in a college physics context. His engineering training means he treats every problem as a physical system first and an equation second, pushing for the conceptual reasoning behind each step rather than formula-matching. Rated 4.9 by students.

Biomedical engineering at Brown means Phillip solves physics problems with real biological stakes — modeling fluid flow through vessels, analyzing stress on implant materials, calculating electrical signals in tissue. That daily overlap with mechanics, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism gives him a practical fluency that makes college physics problem sets feel less abstract and more like puzzles with actual answers. Rated 5.0 by students.

Princeton's mechanical and aerospace engineering program is essentially a four-year immersion in applied physics — Fred spent it solving problems in fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, structural mechanics, and orbital motion, which maps directly onto the topics that fill college physics syllabi. He breaks down force diagrams and energy methods by connecting them to the engineering contexts where those concepts actually get used, making abstract problem sets feel more concrete. His 1550 SAT reflects the quantitative precision he brings to calculus-heavy coursework.

Theater might not scream physics, but Amber's breadth across math and science tutoring — from calculus to chemistry to AP-level coursework — means she's comfortable with the quantitative reasoning that college physics demands, and her 5.0 rating confirms students agree. She's particularly effective at teaching the problem-setup habits that separate students who flounder from those who don't: sketching free-body diagrams, identifying conservation laws, and translating word problems into equations before plugging in numbers. Her ACT 35 reflects the kind of cross-disciplinary sharpness that keeps pace with fast-moving, concept-dense courses.

A molecular biology background means Andrew regularly encountered physics in disguise — diffusion rates, membrane potentials, fluid dynamics in biological systems — before his doctoral work added another layer of analytical rigor. He breaks down mechanics and thermodynamics problems by connecting them to tangible phenomena, which makes the abstract math feel less like symbol-pushing. Rated 4.8 by students.

Biomedical engineering at Duke means Eric solves physics problems daily — modeling forces on prosthetic joints, analyzing fluid flow through artificial vessels, calculating electrical signals in biosensors — so the mechanics and electromagnetism in a college physics course map directly onto work he's already doing. He breaks multi-step problems into their physical components first, making sure the reasoning is solid before any math hits the page. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Molecular biology might seem like a different world from physics, but Agustin's coursework lives in the overlap — diffusion equations, fluid dynamics in cellular transport, and the thermodynamics behind protein folding all demand real physics fluency. He pairs that life-sciences perspective with strong quantitative chops (1560 SAT) to break down mechanics and energy problems in ways that click for students who think more naturally in biological terms than abstract force diagrams.

Engineering coursework at Cornell means Abby is actively grinding through the same calculus-based physics — mechanics, wave motion, electromagnetism — that her students are tackling, which keeps her explanations grounded in the specific problem styles and pitfalls that show up on current exams. She breaks down multi-step problems by isolating the physical principle first, then translating it into the math, so students stop guessing which equation to use. Holds a 5.0 rating.

Running an immunology lab at Columbia University Medical Center means Matthew applies physics daily in ways most tutors haven't — calibrating imaging equipment, analyzing force and pressure data in tissue samples, and troubleshooting instruments that depend on optics and electromagnetism. That hands-on fluency, combined with a physics degree and a 35 ACT, lets him teach college-level mechanics and E&M problems by connecting equations to the physical systems they actually describe.