Award-Winning AP English Language and Composition Tutors
serving Chicago, IL

A PhD candidate in Comparative Human Development at the University of Chicago, Gabriel reads nonfiction through an interdisciplinary lens — tracking how authors frame evidence, shift registers, and position themselves relative to competing claims. That training in analyzing how arguments actually function across disciplines translates directly to the AP Lang exam's synthesis and rhetorical analysis essays, where students need to explain an author's strategic choices rather than just paraphrase content. Rated 5.0 by students.

Rhetoric is everywhere, and AP Lang is the class that finally makes students see it — in speeches, editorials, even advertisements. Jack's dual background in theatre and economics means he can unpack both the emotional persuasion of a Kennedy address and the logical structure of an economic policy argument. He zeroes in on building the synthesis and argument essays, where students often struggle to integrate sources without losing their own voice.

Rhetorical analysis is really an argument about arguments — identifying how a writer deploys ethos, logos, and pathos to move an audience. Callie's History and Philosophy of Science background at UChicago means she spends her own coursework dissecting exactly these persuasive structures in complex texts. She applies that same analytical lens to AP Lang prompts, walking students through how to build a thesis that does more than summarize.

AP Lang is Eliza's favorite subject to teach, and it shows — she brings real rhetorical analysis experience from writing for three newspapers, including the AJC and NPR. She digs into how authors deploy ethos, logos, and pathos in specific passages, then coaches students to replicate that same strategic awareness in their own synthesis and argument essays.

AP Lang is fundamentally about argument — how writers construct it, how readers dissect it, and how students can do both under timed pressure. Joseph's international studies background means he's spent years analyzing persuasive texts across political and cultural contexts, and he brings that same close-reading discipline to rhetorical analysis essays and synthesis prompts. He's particularly sharp on teaching students to identify and deploy ethos, logos, and pathos with precision.

Karin McKie, MFA, compiles curriculum and personalizes teaching for a broad spectrum of students. I know there is no better, nor more crucial, calling than helping learners communicate their voices and realize their educational dreams. I specialize in tutoring all standardized tests, including the LSAT, SAT, PSAT, ACT, GRE, HSPT, ISEE, Accuplacer, STAAR, TOEFL/IELTS, ASVAB, all AP/IB English and history classes, and more. I also created and published a simple reading annotation system and related strategies specifically to tackle timed tests, as well as teaching critical reading, comparative literature, public speaking, and theater. As a professional writer and editor, I coach students in persuasive writing for schoolwork, college application and supplemental essays, internship and job applications, and the like. For decades, I've taught and lectured at universities, schools, and with individuals in Chicagoland and the Bay Area, and to online students of all ages around the world. I customize study plans with learners and their advocates to utilize existing abilities and add new techniques to reach personal and scholastic goals. I have a BS in Communications and Theater, and an MFA in Creative Writing. I have completed Continuing Education courses at Stanford, Northwestern and DePaul Universities. I'm a professional features writer and culture critic. I've edited Perspective design journal and Reed literary magazine and have performed memoir essays I've written on Chicago Public Radio. I come from a family of teachers and was fortunate to grow up at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, where my anthropologist mom was Education Director. Since early childhood, I've been immersed in multicultural and ELL education. I've devoted my personal and professional time to diversity and storytelling, starting at public TV station WETA in my hometown outside Washington, D.C., where I was certified as a trainer with Sesame Street's Preschool Education Project. I've also taught creativity and teambuilding through improvisation to all ages (as well as creating a kids summer camp), reading for the SAG Foundations BookPALS (Performing Artists for Literacy in Schools) program, plus reading and writing skills to at-risk students through the Park District's Kraft Great Kids Program. I've assisted many of my arts marketing clients, including Barrel of Monkeys and Kidworks Touring Theatre, with youth literacy programs at schools and libraries throughout the Windy City.

Rhetorical analysis clicks faster when a student can name exactly what an author is doing and why it works on a reader. Christopher breaks down AP Lang skills like argument structure, synthesis of sources, and strategic use of evidence, bringing the same analytical precision he applies to his Harvard engineering coursework to the craft of persuasive writing.

Todd's social work training at the University of Chicago — where every case study demanded parsing competing narratives and constructing evidence-backed arguments — maps directly onto what AP Lang asks students to do with nonfiction prose. His biology background also means he's comfortable coaching students through the science-heavy source sets that frequently appear in synthesis prompts, where translating data into persuasive claims is half the battle. Rated 5.0 by students.

AP Lang is ultimately an argument exam — every rhetorical analysis, synthesis essay, and multiple-choice passage comes back to identifying how writers build and defend claims. Bianca's legal studies background gives her a sharp eye for dissecting rhetorical strategies like appeals to ethos, strategic concessions, and logical structure. Rated 5.0 by students, she breaks down the AP scoring rubric so students know exactly what earns top marks.

AP Lang is ultimately about dissecting how writers build arguments — identifying rhetorical strategies like appeals to ethos, strategic concessions, and shifts in tone, then articulating that analysis in timed essays. Micah pairs his genuine love of reading with a structured, analytical mindset from his engineering coursework, which turns out to be exactly the combination this exam rewards.

AP Lang asks students to do something most high schoolers haven't practiced: dissect how an argument is built rather than just what it says. Hannahlore teaches students to identify rhetorical moves — shifts in tone, strategic concessions, appeals to credibility — and then deploy those same techniques in their own synthesis and argument essays. Her analytical chemistry training translates surprisingly well here; she approaches a passage the way she'd approach data, looking for structure underneath the surface.

Scoring well on the AP Lang exam means learning to read like a writer — dissecting how authors use rhetorical strategies like juxtaposition, appeals to credibility, and shifts in tone to build an argument. Connor's background as a serious reader and writer gives him a sharp eye for the structural choices that students need to identify in the multiple-choice section and replicate in their own synthesis and argument essays.

Trained in NYU's Accelerated MAT program for Secondary English, Jennifer knows the AP Lang exam inside and out — from rhetorical analysis essays to the synthesis prompt's demand for integrating multiple sources into a cohesive argument. She teaches students to identify an author's strategic choices (diction, structure, appeals) and articulate their effects with precision, which is exactly what earns high marks on the rhetorical analysis free response.

AP Lang is fundamentally about argument — how writers build it, how readers detect it, and how students can do both on exam day. Carla teaches rhetorical analysis by dissecting real speeches and essays, showing students how to identify strategies like appeals to ethos or strategic concession and then write about them with precision. Her 5.0 rating speaks to how well this approach clicks.

Rhetorical analysis is the backbone of AP Lang, and most students struggle not with identifying ethos or logos but with explaining *how* those strategies function in a specific argument. Michelle digs into the synthesis and argument essays as well, showing students how to weave source material into a thesis without letting it take over. Her writing background makes her especially sharp on voice and structure.

Rhetoric is the backbone of AP Lang, and Jean's legal training gives her a practitioner's understanding of how arguments actually persuade. She teaches students to dissect an author's use of appeals, concessions, and strategic evidence — then apply those same techniques in their own synthesis and argument essays. Her students learn to read like lawyers: identifying what a writer is doing and why it works on the audience.

AP English Language is ultimately about rhetoric: understanding how writers persuade and then doing it yourself under a forty-minute clock. David digs into the synthesis, rhetorical analysis, and argument essays individually, teaching students to identify techniques like juxtaposition, appeals to authority, and strategic concession before they ever start writing. His dual English degrees and library science training make him especially sharp on evaluating sources and constructing evidence-driven arguments.

A licensed English 6-12 teacher with a Vanderbilt degree in English Literature, Karen knows the AP Lang exam inside and out — from dissecting rhetorical strategies in nonfiction passages to crafting airtight synthesis and argument essays under time pressure. She teaches students to identify how authors use diction, tone, and structure as persuasive tools, which is the analytical muscle the exam actually tests.

The rhetorical analysis essay trips up even strong writers because it requires naming what an author is doing and explaining why it works. Rebecca breaks down argument structure, rhetorical strategies like appeals and syntax choices, and the synthesis essay's demand for integrating multiple sources into a cohesive position. Her 5.0 rating speaks to how clearly she communicates these skills.

The AP Lang exam tests whether a student can dissect an argument's structure and then build one of their own under time pressure. Tegan teaches rhetorical analysis by walking through how authors deploy evidence, tone shifts, and concessions — skills that translate directly to the synthesis and argument essays. Her 1520 SAT score reflects the same command of analytical reading and writing the exam demands.

AP Lang is ultimately about argument — how writers build it, how readers evaluate it, and how students construct their own on exam day. Ariel unpacks rhetorical strategies like ethos, logos, and kairos in published essays, then applies those same principles when coaching students through synthesis, argument, and rhetorical analysis prompts. Her background in psychology at Brown gives her a sharp eye for how language persuades.

The rhetorical analysis essay trips up even strong writers because it demands a vocabulary most students haven't practiced — logos, kairos, syntactic choices, shifts in tone. Sophia breaks down how to read a nonfiction passage as a series of deliberate authorial moves, then construct a thesis that does more than list devices. Her experience as both a writer and editor means she can quickly pinpoint where an argument loses its thread.

AP Lang is fundamentally an argumentation course, and Richard's Government major at Harvard means he spends most of his academic life analyzing rhetorical strategies in political speeches, policy briefs, and persuasive essays. He teaches students to dissect how authors deploy ethos, logos, and pathos — then apply that same awareness to their own synthesis and argument essays. That analytical muscle is exactly what earns 7s, 8s, and 9s on the free-response section.

AP Lang is fundamentally about argument — identifying how writers use rhetorical strategies like appeals, concessions, and counterarguments to build persuasive cases. Brett approaches the course's synthesis and rhetorical analysis essays the way he approaches scientific writing at Rice: every claim needs evidence, every paragraph needs a clear purpose. He's especially sharp on teaching students to dissect an author's line of reasoning in the rhetorical analysis prompt.