All GRE Subject Test: Psychology Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #1 : Measurement & Methodology
Which of the following theorists is most commonly associated with projective personality testing?
McKinley
Watson
Millon
Rorschach
Hathaway
Rorschach
“Rorschach” is the only name associated with projective personality tests. Projective tests involve ambiguous stimuli and are believed to reveal underlying thoughts and emotions. Rorschach was a leader in developing the scoring system for the Rorschach Inkblot test. “Millon” developed the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III), an objective personality test. “Hathaway” and “McKinley” are both associated with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2). Last, “Watson” was an American psychologist who founded behaviorism and is associated with classical conditioning.
Example Question #2 : Measurement & Methodology
Which of the following is not a common difficulty associated with the double-blind study protocol?
Keeping researchers blind to the groupings usually involves significant expenses or time investment that studies often cannot afford
Clinical protocols may make a double-blind methodology impractical (i.e. in treatment effects involving invasive surgery vs. no invasive surgery, where scars would be visible)
Researchers may have to settle for a less powerful treatment effect, as a more powerful one would "tip them off" to which group was being treated
If a medical treatment is discovered to be very effective, it might be unethical to continue withholding treatment from the control group
Double-blind studies make subsequent meta-analysis of the results more difficult, as it becomes harder to separate the results of the study from the expectations of the hypothesis
Double-blind studies make subsequent meta-analysis of the results more difficult, as it becomes harder to separate the results of the study from the expectations of the hypothesis
In a double-blind protocol, both the research participants and the researchers engaging in the study are unaware of which participants are in the control group and which are in the experimental group. This actually makes subsequent meta-analysis of the double-blinded results easier, as a correctly applied double-blindness will remove any of the researcher's biases from the results.
Example Question #3 : Measurement & Methodology
Melanie is a regular customer at a gun range, where she shoots paper targets with three different types of guns: a rifle, a pistol, and a shotgun. When firing the rifle, Melanie notices that her shots nearly always hit the target, but are evenly spread out throughout the paper's surface. When firing the pistol, Melanie's shots are all grouped within a few inches of each other, with the group overlaying the bull’s-eye on the target. When firing the shotgun, Melanie's shots are also tightly grouped, but the groups of shots are all slightly above the bull’s-eye. Which of the following terms is best describes Melanie's performance with the shotgun compared to her performance with the pistol?
Melanie is more reliable with the pistol than the shotgun, but more valid with the shotgun than the pistol
Melanie is not reliable or valid with the shotgun, but is valid with the pistol
Melanie is equally valid with pistol and shotgun, and more reliable with the pistol
Melanie is more valid with the pistol, but equally reliable with both pistol and shotgun
None of these
Melanie is more valid with the pistol, but equally reliable with both pistol and shotgun
Reliability is the ability of a measure, test, or effect to produce the same result upon repeated trials. In this case reliability was analogous to the grouping of shots on the target irrespective of the placement of the group. Validity is the ability of a test to measure what it is intended to measure or of a treatment to produce the effect it is purported to produce. In this case validity was analogous to the placement of shots on the target—the closer to the bull’s-eye, the more valid the shots.
In the scenario, the shots from the pistol—which hit both the target on the bull’s-eye and were grouped closely together—are valid and reliable. On the other hand, the shotgun shots—which are only grouped together but are not accurate to the bull’s-eye—are equally reliable but less valid.
Example Question #1 : Construction, Reliability, & Validity Of Testing Methods
A sample of players on a baseball team are chosen to be drug tested. Which of the following methods could league officials use to ensure that the players are randomly selected?
Choosing to test every player over thirty years of age
Choosing to test all of the pitchers on the team
Choosing to test every player with over ten home runs
Asking for volunteers and then testing those players
Choosing to test every fifth player on an alphabetically-listed roster
Choosing to test every fifth player on an alphabetically-listed roster
Random selection allows all of the players on the team to have an equal chance of being chosen for testing. Choosing to test only players of a certain age or position, or only testing those that volunteer or have reached a certain statistical benchmark, would exclude a number of the players on the roster from having a chance to be chosen.
Example Question #1 : Measurement & Methodology
Dana is participating in a study that asks her to press a red button every time the computer screen in front of her shows a letter X.
The computer screen shows a letter "T." Dana presses the red button. Dana's response is considered to be which of the following?
None of these
Hit
Correct rejection
Miss
False alarm
False alarm
A false alarm is a response that says the target stimulus (in this case, the letter X) has been detected when that stimulus is not present.
Example Question #2 : Construction, Reliability, & Validity Of Testing Methods
Dr. Crawford believes she has invented a pill to help with student memorization. For a trial experiment, she gathered two groups of twenty students. She gave the twenty students in Group A the “smart pill”, and the twenty students in Group B a sugar pill. After waiting five minutes, both groups of students were given a list of forty words, and were instructed to memorize the entire list in any order. The students were given five minutes to memorize the list. The students were then asked to verbally recite all of the words they could remember in any order within three minutes.
Group A recited an average of fifteen words, while Group B recited an average of ten words.
In this experiment, what is the dependent variable?
Reciting the list in any order
Number of words recited correctly
Students' receipt of the smart pill vs. the sugar pill
Five minutes to study the list
Group A vs. Group B
Number of words recited correctly
The dependent variable is the item actually being measured or analyzed the support or reject the hypothesis. The dependent variable measures the effect of the independent variable.
Example Question #2 : Construction, Reliability, & Validity Of Testing Methods
Dr. Crawford believes she has invented a pill to help with student memorization. For a trial experiment, she gathered two groups of twenty students. She gave the twenty students in Group A the “smart pill”, and the twenty students in Group B a sugar pill. After waiting five minutes, both groups of students were given a list of forty words, and were instructed to memorize the entire list in any order. The students were given five minutes to memorize the list. The students were then asked to verbally recite all of the words they could remember in any order within three minutes.
Group A recited an average of fifteen words, while Group B recited an average of ten words.
What is Dr. Smart’s null hypothesis?
The number of the words recited by Group A will be greater than or equal to the number of words recited by Group B.
The smart pill works.
There is a significant difference between the number of correct words recited by Group A and Group B.
There is no significant difference between the number of correct words recited by Group A and Group B.
The number of the words recited by Group B will be less than the number of words recited by Group A.
There is no significant difference between the number of correct words recited by Group A and Group B.
The null hypothesis suggests that the independent variable has no effect in the experiment. If Dr. Crawford’s null hypothesis is supported, then her smart pill has virtually no effect on student memorization. The goal is to reject the null hypothesis with results from the experiment.
Example Question #4 : Construction, Reliability, & Validity Of Testing Methods
Dr. Crawford believes she has invented a pill to help with student memorization. For a trial experiment, she gathered two groups of twenty students. She gave the twenty students in Group A the “smart pill”, and the twenty students in Group B a sugar pill. After waiting five minutes, both groups of students were given a list of forty words, and were instructed to memorize the entire list in any order. The students were given five minutes to memorize the list. The students were then asked to verbally recite all of the words they could remember in any order within three minutes.
Group A recited an average of fifteen words, while Group B recited an average of ten words.
What sort of experimental design is this?
Independent measures
Repeated measures
Separate variables
Counterbalancing method
Independent variables
Independent measures
Independent measures designs describe an experiment in which there are two or more separate groups. In Dr. Crawford’s experiment, the two groups are the students in Group A and Group B. The students do not overlap groups, and are only exposed to one of the two conditions during the experiment.
Example Question #5 : Construction, Reliability, & Validity Of Testing Methods
Dr. Crawford believes she has invented a pill to help with student memorization. For a trial experiment, she gathered two groups of twenty students. She gave the twenty students in Group A the “smart pill”, and the twenty students in Group B a sugar pill. After waiting five minutes, both groups of students were given a list of forty words, and were instructed to memorize the entire list in any order. The students were given five minutes to memorize the list. The students were then asked to verbally recite all of the words they could remember in any order within three minutes.
Group A recited an average of fifteen words, while Group B recited an average of ten words.
In this experiment, what is the independent variable?
Students' receipt of the smart pill vs. the sugar pill
Five minutes given to study the list
Group A versus Group B
Reciting the list in any order
The number of words recited
Students' receipt of the smart pill vs. the sugar pill
The independent variable is what the researcher manipulates in order to test his or her hypothesis. In this experiment, Dr. Smart gave one group the smart pill and the other group a sugar pill in order to evaluate the smart pill's effect on student memorization.
Example Question #6 : Construction, Reliability, & Validity Of Testing Methods
Dr. Crawford believes she has invented a pill to help with student memorization. For a trial experiment, she gathered two groups of twenty students. She gave the twenty students in Group A the “smart pill”, and the twenty students in Group B a sugar pill. After waiting five minutes, both groups of students were given a list of forty words, and were instructed to memorize the entire list in any order. The students were given five minutes to memorize the list. The students were then asked to verbally recite all of the words they could remember in any order within three minutes.
Group A recited an average of fifteen words, while Group B recited an average of ten words.
Group A is the __________.
tester group
control group
experimental group
placebo group
independent variable
experimental group
The experimental group is the group assigned to measure the effect of the independent variable. Students in Group A were given the smart pill, and thus their results will be analyzed to measure the effect it had on student memorization.