CPA Auditing and Attestation (AUD) : Types of Engagements - SSARS

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for CPA Auditing and Attestation (AUD)

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store

All CPA Auditing and Attestation (AUD) Resources

61 Practice Tests Question of the Day Flashcards Learn by Concept

Example Questions

Example Question #1 : Integrated Audits & Attestation Engagements

One of the general conditions for SSARS engagements contains the phrase “presumptively mandatory requirements”. Under this definition:

Possible Answers:

Auditors must comply with requirements

Noncompliance is allowed it the procedure is deemed ineffective

Auditor judgement prevails

Auditors must comply except where it is not cost efficient to do so

Correct answer:

Auditors must comply with requirements

Explanation:

The concept of presumptive mandatory requirements assumes that in the absence of persuasive evidence, the auditor must comply with the pronouncement.

Example Question #2 : Integrated Audits & Attestation Engagements

Auditors should not accept and engagement under SSARS if they question:

Possible Answers:

Managements integrity

Independence requirements will not be satisfied

Information needed may not be available

All of the answer choices are correct

Correct answer:

All of the answer choices are correct

Explanation:

Under SSARS guidance an auditor should not accept an engagement if they are concerned about management integrity or the availability of information.  An engagement should also not be accepted if independence requirements are impaired.

Example Question #3 : Integrated Audits & Attestation Engagements

Jim Jones, CPA has been engaged by management to assist them in the preparation of financial statements. This engagement qualifies as a:

Possible Answers:

Compilation

Attestation

Review

Audit

Correct answer:

Compilation

Explanation:

A compilation engagement is one in which the accounting firm assists management with the preparation of its financial statements.

Example Question #4 : Integrated Audits & Attestation Engagements

A CPA auditor has determined that a client which had received a federal grant, fraudulently reported information to the federal government. Management of the client refuses to recognize the fraud. Of the following parties, which should the auditor contact first?

Possible Answers:

The state attorney general's office

The recipiencts of the client services

The agency that provided the grant

The state board of accountancy

Correct answer:

The agency that provided the grant

Explanation:

First, the auditor should attempt to reach the agency that provided the grant in reporting the fraud. The others listed are not required to contact.

Example Question #5 : Integrated Audits & Attestation Engagements

GAS require a written report on internal control:

Possible Answers:

Either orally or in writing

In every audit

Only when there are reportable conditions that are significant enough to be material weaknesses

Only when there are reportable conditions

Correct answer:

In every audit

Explanation:

GAS requires a written report on every audit of internal control.

Example Question #6 : Integrated Audits & Attestation Engagements

Of the followin SSARS engagements, which requires limited assurance rather than no assurance?

Possible Answers:

All require limited assurance

Compilation

Preparation

Review

Correct answer:

Review

Explanation:

Of the options, preparation and compilation require no assurance whereas review engagements require limited assurance.

All CPA Auditing and Attestation (AUD) Resources

61 Practice Tests Question of the Day Flashcards Learn by Concept
Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors